Aristo
2006-11-03 13:02:09 UTC
Hi Selma & Cornel,
I have not been following this thread in its entirety, but this one
caught my eye. I claim no expert knowledge about the history of the
semantics of racial group terminologies, but I have a few thoughts on
today's usage. I don't see the need to invent any new words. As you
may have noticed, I have used the word "Black" instead of
"African-XXXXX" before and I do so frequently, as I am not a stickler
for political correctness. I even use the word "Chinky" while speaking
instead of "Oriental" or "Asian".
Now while "Black" is not considered derogatory by all, "Chinky" is
considered by them as equal to the term "Nigger". But as usual, a
fellow Chinky can use the term. Note that "Oriental" & "Asian" does
not include the Chinky-eyed people of Hawaii while "Asian" obviously
includes non-Chinky races.
Now I don't see any reason why we shouldn't call a fig a fig (the word
"spade" replaced for obvious reasons!). Both, "Black" and "Chinky"
refer to PHYSICAL characteristics rather than the REGIONAL roots that
their politically correct counterparts refer to (which are not
neccessarily correct). Why should a Black feel insecure about his or
her skin colour, or a Chinky about the shape of his or her eyes? My
exception is to the MANNER or CONTEXT in which the words are used. If
it is used in a derogatory sense, then I protest. In fact, even their
politically correct counterparts can be used derogatorily, which I
would then take exception to, especially when prefixed with that
horrible word "THESE"! Eg. "these" African-Americans, "these"
Orientals, and my latest favorite: "these" Bharats!
I hope to see a future bigotless generation where we wouldn't have any
qualms or insecurities about the semantics of racial or ethnic group
terminologies. In fact, I am already starting to see it.
Cheers,
Aristo.
On 11/1/06, Carvalho <elisabeth_car at yahoo.com> wrote:
.... I looked up the word "negro" at Wikipedia and indeed
I have not been following this thread in its entirety, but this one
caught my eye. I claim no expert knowledge about the history of the
semantics of racial group terminologies, but I have a few thoughts on
today's usage. I don't see the need to invent any new words. As you
may have noticed, I have used the word "Black" instead of
"African-XXXXX" before and I do so frequently, as I am not a stickler
for political correctness. I even use the word "Chinky" while speaking
instead of "Oriental" or "Asian".
Now while "Black" is not considered derogatory by all, "Chinky" is
considered by them as equal to the term "Nigger". But as usual, a
fellow Chinky can use the term. Note that "Oriental" & "Asian" does
not include the Chinky-eyed people of Hawaii while "Asian" obviously
includes non-Chinky races.
Now I don't see any reason why we shouldn't call a fig a fig (the word
"spade" replaced for obvious reasons!). Both, "Black" and "Chinky"
refer to PHYSICAL characteristics rather than the REGIONAL roots that
their politically correct counterparts refer to (which are not
neccessarily correct). Why should a Black feel insecure about his or
her skin colour, or a Chinky about the shape of his or her eyes? My
exception is to the MANNER or CONTEXT in which the words are used. If
it is used in a derogatory sense, then I protest. In fact, even their
politically correct counterparts can be used derogatorily, which I
would then take exception to, especially when prefixed with that
horrible word "THESE"! Eg. "these" African-Americans, "these"
Orientals, and my latest favorite: "these" Bharats!
I hope to see a future bigotless generation where we wouldn't have any
qualms or insecurities about the semantics of racial or ethnic group
terminologies. In fact, I am already starting to see it.
Cheers,
Aristo.
On 11/1/06, Carvalho <elisabeth_car at yahoo.com> wrote:
.... I looked up the word "negro" at Wikipedia and indeed
it is noted as archaic and having a negative
connotation. Yet, in the US, the word is used without
prejudice, such as in the United Negro College, negro
art, or he is a "fine negro man"
....I have yet to come across an alternative to the word,connotation. Yet, in the US, the word is used without
prejudice, such as in the United Negro College, negro
art, or he is a "fine negro man"
which unfortunately has its origins in its latin
genesis meaning "black". In America, "blacks" is an
acceptable term but I have always found the term
unacceptable and have refrained from using it. I also
refrain from calling them Africans because Africa
consists of Arabs, Semites, and any other number of
races which are not "negroid" genetically.
....So now I am on a quest to find the right word.genesis meaning "black". In America, "blacks" is an
acceptable term but I have always found the term
unacceptable and have refrained from using it. I also
refrain from calling them Africans because Africa
consists of Arabs, Semites, and any other number of
races which are not "negroid" genetically.
However, I know two words I have to delete from my
vocabulary "negro" and "madrassi". Any suggestions to
alternatives are welcome :))
vocabulary "negro" and "madrassi". Any suggestions to
alternatives are welcome :))